How to justify the establishment of social justice in a democratic society?
How to justify the establishment of social justice in a democratic society?
A distinction is thus made between equality of rights, equality of situations and equality of opportunity. To contribute to the social justicepublic authorities can act on taxation and collective services, but also on redistribution policies, i.e. through the protection social.
How to justify social inequalities?
Is there a legitimate way to justify social inequalities? What role can merit play and under what conditions? An analysis by Patrick Savidan (University of Paris-Sorbonne). In the age of the individual, the most usual way of justifying inequalities has always been to rely on the criterion of merit.
What is meritocracy?
The term has been embraced uncritically by proponents of a social philosophy of meritocracy whereby influence is supposed to be distributed according to individuals’ intellectual ability and performance. Many appreciate the two fundamental virtues of meritocracy.
What is the difference between meritocracy and social mobility?
The meritocratic ideal is attractive. But, under a “rhetoric of social mobility”, it masks the reinforcement of inequalities. Meritocracy is problematic because it reinforces the beliefs of a satisfied caste and the resentment of others.
How does meritocracy democratize society?
Corporations and other social institutions, which were once run by hereditary elites, are increasingly recruiting and promoting people on the basis of qualifications, abilities, skills and performance. Meritocracy is therefore supposed to democratize and level society.
