What is the specificity of legal-rational domination?

What is the specificity of legal-rational domination?

The rational domination–legal Where legal–rational or bureaucratic, which rests on the belief in the legitimacy of the legal rules adopted and of the right to give directives possessed by those who exercise domination by these means.

What are the three types of domination according to Max Weber?

Max Weber and the legitimacy of power

• The domination rational legal. The domination may be of a legal rational nature. …
• The domination traditional. The domination can also be traditional in nature. …
• The domination charismatic. The domination can also be charismatic. …
• Conclusion. …
• For further.

What type of authority is favored by Max Weber?

According to Max WeberI’authority legal opposes theauthority traditional andauthority charismatic by the fact that she is impersonal: by obeying the bureaucratic head, we would in fact only be respecting the formal rule while the link that unites us to theauthority traditional or charismatic would be…

What are the forms of legitimacy of power?

According to Karine Gatelier, the sources of the legitimacy politics can be electoral, traditional, ideological or circumstantial.

What are the interpersonal sources of power?

The sources internal to be able to Charisma is a leader’s ability to influence individuals through his personal magnetism, his enthusiasm and deep convictions. Indeed, leaders typically communicate their beliefs and perspectives through dramatic and persuasive speech.

What is dominance in sociological analysis?

Dominance is a central concept in sociological analysis. So much so that a sociology of domination has made it the key word of its explanations. This article retraces the meanings that this notion has received in the history of thought and in contemporary sociology.

What is the difference between power and dominance?

Power and dominance. A strong tendency in the political tradition of the Moderns tends to identify “power” with the sovereign state. Approached from this angle, power appears inseparable from domination, that is to say from an asymmetrical relationship between individuals who are in a position to command and others who owe them obedience.

Why is power inseparable from domination?

Approached from this angle, power appears inseparable from domination, that is to say from an asymmetrical relationship between individuals who are in a position to command and others who owe them obedience. This relationship, in which the domination of some is offset by the subjection of others,…

What is the effect of symbolic domination?

“The effect of symbolic domination]is exercised not in the pure logic of knowing consciousnesses, but in the obscurity of the dispositions of the habitus in which are inscribed the schemes of perception, appreciation and action which are the basis, beyond the decisions of conscience and the controls of the will, a relationship of knowledge and …